TestMyself.appAll mirrors
g
An adult cognitive reasoning estimate

Measure carefully.
Interpret humbly.

Fifty problems, drawn fresh for each sitting from a bank of 145 original items, sample fluid, quantitative, verbal, spatial, and working-memory performance. Scoring is fully transparent: raw correct counts, a plainly labeled measurement band, and a per-domain profile — no black-box curve fitting, no invented precision.

The important limitation: a calibrated IQ score requires representative age norms, demonstrated reliability and validity, standardized administration, and often a qualified examiner. This browser test has not yet been normed on a representative population. It therefore reports a raw score (correct out of 50), an experimental IQ estimate fitted from content-rated question difficulties, a measurement band for this sitting, and a domain profile — and no percentiles, until a norming study exists. It is designed for self-understanding, not clinical diagnosis, school placement, or employment decisions.
50 sampled items · about 45 min
Five cognitive domains
No account · nothing uploaded
Why this test — the research

Why: reasoning under time pressure feeds every other work skill.

Evidence: Schmidt & Hunter’s 85-year meta-analysis ranked general mental ability the top predictor of job performance (≈ .51) and training success; a 2022 re-analysis argues ≈ .31 under stricter corrections — the ranking holds either way.

Sources: Schmidt & Hunter (1998), Psychological Bulletin · Sackett et al. (2022), Journal of Applied Psychology

Best on a laptop or tablet. Each sitting draws a fresh sample of 50 from the 145-item bank, so retakes differ — but do not retake for at least six months; practice can inflate the result.

45:00

Scoring your responses…

Raw correct counts per domain — nothing fitted, nothing hidden

Raw score — experimental, not normed

Score and measurement band

What the result says—and does not say

Your profile

Performance by domain

Strongest evidence

Best development target

Scoring and session notes

Session notes

Keep the mirrors free.

If this was worth more than you expected, a small tip keeps the next mirror free. No account, no guilt, no effect on your results. Sharing helps just as much.

Method note: fixed-form sampled administration — each sitting draws 50 items (10 per domain) from a 145-item bank of original items; scoring is raw correct counts with a binomial measurement band. No percentiles are reported pending a norming study. This is not the WAIS and uses no protected WAIS items. Testing principles: Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing; context for formal adult assessment: Pearson WAIS-5 overview; web testing caution: APA on responsible web testing.
Read retest guidance